Pro-Government Militias

Pro-Government Militia Website

Amuka (Uganda)

Basic Group Information

Name assigned by coder: no
PGM ID Number: 485
Country: Uganda
Date formed: Nov. 14, 2003
    Accuracy of date formed: year
Details of Formation: The Amuka militia is an auxiliary local self-defense force, formed to fight the Lord's Resistance Army (LRA) rebels alongside Uganda People's Defence Forces (UPDF). Members are recruited from and operate in the Lango District.
Date dissolved: Oct. 1, 2008
    Accuracy of date dissolved: year
Details of Termination: Although there is no clear evidence of the group being terminated, one source mentions the group being ‘disbanded’ in 2008.
Termination Type(s): unclear

Former and Successor Group Information

Predecessor group(s): none
Successor group(s): none
Private Military Company? no
Former Group? no
    Former Armed Group? NA
Former Rebel Group? NA
    Former Rebel Group UCDP ID: none
PGM Becomes Rebel Group? no
    Successor Rebel Group UCDP ID: none

Government Relation, Support, and Training

Government Relation: semi-official (type 2)
Created by the Government?: unclear
    Main Creating Government Institution: none
Government Link(s): person/minister; state (institution)
    If link to party, name of party:
Training and Equipment: yes
Shared Information and Joint Operations: yes
Shared Personnel: no information
Type(s) of Material Support: domestic government
State Sponsor(s): none
Other Connection(s):

Group Characteristics

Membership: no information
Primary Membership: local
Alternative Primary Membership: no information
Location: Lango
Force Strength: [1500, 10000]
Target(s): rebels, insurgents, or other armed group
Purpose(s): protect national borders and integrity; fight insurgents

Ethnic Characteristics

Ethnic Target(s): none
    Quality of Information for Ethnic Targeting: not applicable
Ethnic Membership: none
    Quality of Information for Ethnic Membership: not applicable
Ethnic Purpose: none
    Quality of Information for Ethnic Purpose: not applicable

Other Information

Other Information:

New Variables from Meta-Analysis

Purpose

Purpose: When the LRA became more aggressive and expanded its area of operation in Uganda in mid-2003, the army proved less equipped to fight the enemy. Several local militias were raised, including the Amuka in the Lango region. The militias achieved the purpose for which they were established, namely fighting LRA rebels, even though Amuka did not do as well as other militias since they were less equipped and loosely committed. These local militias were able to obtain more accurate intelligence information as they knew the local languages (Rukooko: 224).
Relative Benefit(s) of PGM Use knowledge; local support

Treatment of Civilians

Treatment of Civilians: The Amuka militia existed in order to shield civilians from LRA rebel violence within their region of Lango. Incidents of violence against civilians have not been reported.
Type(s) of Violence against Civilians: unknown

Reasons for Membership

PGM Members Coerced? no
PGM Members Paid? yes
Reasons for Membership: Recruits of the Amuka militia received regular payment, which reassured them of the government’s recognition of their effort to bring peace to the country.
PGM Members Killed? no information

PGM Size

Size:

Weapons and Training

Weapons and Training: The Amuka militia underwent training at Aler Farm, nine miles from Lira town, under the command of Lt-Col Jim Willis Byarugaba. They were armed with AK-47 rifles.

Organisation

Organisation: Mike Mukula (minister of health during the early 2000s and member of NRM) visited the Amuka training camps and assured the force that the government would provide them with uniforms, boots, food, medicine and payment, thus exercising control via material goods and financial support (Rukooko 2005: 224).

Reference(s) for Meta-Analysis

Rukooko, A. Byaruhanga. 2005. Protracted Civil War, Civil Militias and Political Transition in Uganda since 1986. In David J. Francis (ed.) Civil Militia: Africa’s intractable security menace? Aldershot: Ashgate, 213-230.

Evidence