Pro-Government Militias

Pro-Government Militia Website

Eye for an Eye (Guatemala)

Basic Group Information

Name assigned by coder: no
PGM ID Number: 296
Country: Guatemala
Date formed: Jan. 1, 1969
    Accuracy of date formed: year
Details of Formation:
Date dissolved: Jan. 14, 1986
    Accuracy of date dissolved: day
Details of Termination: There is no reported termination date. However, Eye for an Eye was in favour of and supported by the military governments of Guatemala, therefore the termination of the squad as a Pro-Government Armed Group is coded as the 14 January 1986, when President Cerezo was inaugurated as President of a new civilian government in the country.
Termination Type(s): change in government

Former and Successor Group Information

Predecessor group(s): none
Successor group(s): none
Private Military Company? no
Former Group? no
    Former Armed Group? no
Former Rebel Group? no
    Former Rebel Group UCDP ID: none
PGM Becomes Rebel Group? no
    Successor Rebel Group UCDP ID: none

Government Relation, Support, and Training

Government Relation: informal (type 1)
Created by the Government?: no
    Main Creating Government Institution: none
Government Link(s): state (institution); military (institution)
    If link to party, name of party: None
Training and Equipment: unclear
Shared Information and Joint Operations: yes
Shared Personnel: no information
Type(s) of Material Support: domestic government; landowner; military
State Sponsor(s): none
Other Connection(s):

Group Characteristics

Membership: ethnic; security forces
Primary Membership: noncivilian
Alternative Primary Membership: no information
Location: None
Force Strength: [unknown, unknown]
Target(s): civilians; unarmed political opposition, government critics; ethnic group; peasants
Purpose(s): protect state, national or religious institutions; intimidation of ethnic/religious groups; intimidation of civilians

Ethnic Characteristics

Ethnic Target(s): Mayas (Guatemala)
    Quality of Information for Ethnic Targeting: inferred
Ethnic Membership: Guatemalans (Guatemala)
    Quality of Information for Ethnic Membership: inferred
Ethnic Purpose: Mayas (Guatemala)
    Quality of Information for Ethnic Purpose: inferred

Other Information

Other Information: Eye for an Eye (Spanish: Ojo por Ojo) was a right-wing terrorist group/death squad. Ethnic membership refers to members being from white families, and the state leader’s ethnicity. Ethnic targets (also linked to purpose of intimidation) were indicated as indigenous people. The indigenous population in Guatemala is mainly consisting of Mayas. There are also small minorities of Xinca and Garifunas. It is unclear whether the latter groups were also targeted by Eye for an Eye.

New Variables from Meta-Analysis

Purpose

Purpose:
Relative Benefit(s) of PGM Use unknown

Treatment of Civilians

Treatment of Civilians: Eye for an Eye was involved in killings and mutilations of civilians it suspected of supporting the rebels during the 1970s (Wikipedia Guatemalan Civil War). News sources report killings, disappearances, forced land seizures and torture. Their actions were ordered by powerful landlords or were supported by the police and military. Alongside the White Hand (PGM), it is estimated to be responsible for up to 40,000 deaths between 1954 and 1983.
Type(s) of Violence against Civilians: kidnapping/abductions; killing; torture

Reasons for Membership

PGM Members Coerced? no information
PGM Members Paid? no information
Reasons for Membership: According to a news source, members of the PGM came from middle class white families, attempting to stop political consciousness among Indian population. This might imply that they joined the PGM to ensure their position in society.
PGM Members Killed? no information

PGM Size

Size:

Weapons and Training

Weapons and Training:

Organisation

Organisation: Eye for an Eye was organized as a death squad with largely military membership with some civilian cooperation (Wikipedia Guatemalan Civil War). A news source reports that for some time the group was almost beyond the control of the army, but was later institutionalized in an apparatus within the army high command.

Reference(s) for Meta-Analysis

Wikipedia. “Guatemalan Civil War”. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Guatemalan_Civil_War&oldid=764332157

Evidence