Pro-Government Militias

Pro-Government Militia Website

Tamil Eelam Liberation Organisation (TELO) (Sri Lanka)

Basic Group Information

Name assigned by coder: no
PGM ID Number: 273
Country: Sri Lanka
Date formed: Nov. 14, 1990
    Accuracy of date formed: year
Details of Formation: The group was founded as a political party in 1979, and dates back to 1968 as a student group. Prior to becoming pro-Sri Lankan government it was trained and armed by the Indian army in 1987-90. The PGM was a former rebel group that fought with other Tamil groups for an independent state. In 1986 a dispute with the LTTE (Tamil Tigers) erupted and then the two groups fought violently against each other. The first evidence that TELO has become pro-government is from 1990.
Date dissolved: Jan. 1, 2002
    Accuracy of date dissolved: year
Details of Termination: The leader claimed to give up arms in 1987 but evidence suggests armed activity until about 2000. When the ceasefire was signed in March 2002, it is reported that TELO had already handed over their weapons (one earlier reports claims 2000). Contrary to other groups, there are no more armed incidents reported after the ceasefire in 2002. Members were reluctant to give up their weapons due to concerns about their own protection.
Termination Type(s): disarmed

Former and Successor Group Information

Predecessor group(s): none
Successor group(s): none
Private Military Company? no
Former Group? yes
    Former Armed Group? yes
Former Rebel Group? yes
    Former Rebel Group UCDP ID: 321
PGM Becomes Rebel Group? no
    Successor Rebel Group UCDP ID: none

Government Relation, Support, and Training

Government Relation: informal (type 1)
Created by the Government?: no
    Main Creating Government Institution: none
Government Link(s): state (institution)
    If link to party, name of party: None
Training and Equipment: no information
Shared Information and Joint Operations: yes
Shared Personnel: yes
Type(s) of Material Support: domestic government; crime
State Sponsor(s): none
Other Connection(s):

Group Characteristics

Membership: ethnic; party activists
Primary Membership: political
Alternative Primary Membership: ethnic
Location: North East, Batticaloa
Force Strength: [unknown, 500]
Target(s): rebels, insurgents, or other armed group
Purpose(s): protect state, national or religious institutions; protect national borders and integrity; intelligence gathering; fight insurgents

Ethnic Characteristics

Ethnic Target(s): none
    Quality of Information for Ethnic Targeting: not applicable
Ethnic Membership: Sri Lankan Tamils (Sri Lanka)
    Quality of Information for Ethnic Membership: given
Ethnic Purpose: none
    Quality of Information for Ethnic Purpose: not applicable

Other Information

Other Information: The group collected 'ransom' from businessmen and is still active as a party today. Prior to becoming pro-government, the group worked with the LTTE, but disagreements led to conflict between the two. The PGM also faced internal divisions, leading to a split in the group.

New Variables from Meta-Analysis

Purpose

Purpose: Like other Tamil groups, the PGM was used by the government to help fight the LTTE and its members helped to identify LTTE rebels and supporters.
Relative Benefit(s) of PGM Use unknown

Treatment of Civilians

Treatment of Civilians: Attacks by the group resulted in the death and injury of civilians. It took hostages and was accused of human rights abuses.
Type(s) of Violence against Civilians: kidnapping/abductions; killing

Reasons for Membership

PGM Members Coerced? no information
PGM Members Paid? no information
Reasons for Membership: According to sources, ideology was not a strong incentive for membership, although the goal upon formation was an independent Tamil state (which became more moderate later).
PGM Members Killed? no information

PGM Size

Size:

Weapons and Training

Weapons and Training: Members were trained by Indian intelligence and also received weapons from India before the group became pro-government. Sources state that the government did not authorise their weapons. Weapons included revolvers, guns and explosives.

Organisation

Organisation: There is little information on how the government controlled the PGM, besides that the group cooperated with government forces. One source states that the group’s funding mainly came from criminal activities.

Reference(s) for Meta-Analysis

PGMD

Stanford. “Mapping Militant Organizations. Tamil Eelam Liberation Organization” http://web.stanford.edu/group/mappingmilitants/cgi-bin/groups/print_view/503

Wikipedia. “Tamil Eelam Liberation Organization.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamil_Eelam_Liberation_Organization

Evidence